• Join the A7X Discord!

    We're updating the community and moving all social content from the community to the Discord. All lessons related conversations will still take place here though! Join the Discord below and view the full announcement for more details

    JOIN THE DISCORD VIEW THREAD
Golden Goddess Guitar Leaderboard
Collab final scratch take 1 - Bridge Lead
Rhythm- build up 1st half, take 693 lol
SGS Collab - My Solo v2.0
SGS Collab - Rock Solo
2020 07 14 SGS Build Up 2 Rhythm
SGS Collab - Blues Verse V2.0
Build Up First Half Rhythm (distorted and clean verisons)
Dominik Gräber

SGS Collab - Rock Solo

Here is my take on the collab solo after practicing it for a while. Is it clean enough, does it fit the track well? @Aileé Guerra Aréizaga @Filip Tomiša @Ids Schiere
I also have the files without the backing track should we decide on this to be the final version! \m/
Click to expand...
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: Ed Seith, Cedric L, William B. and 4 others
idssdi
Pretty cool! It does sound a bit like you start running out of ideas at the end. I would probably put the melody/motif in the middle and shred in the beginning and the end(like In Afterlife for example). It does sound clean enough to me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dominik Gräber
Filip Tomiša
Nice! Sounds great! One thing that I think that you did better in the previous version is the tapping part you start playing around 0:14. In this version you do it 4 times but in the prevous one you did it 3 times and I think that that sounded better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: idssdi
Dominik Gräber
Ids Schiere said:
Pretty cool! It does sound a bit like you start running out of ideas at the end. I would probably put the melody/motif in the middle and shred in the beginning and the end(like In Afterlife for example). It does sound clean enough to me.
Click to expand...
I actually like that ending part melody. That's also what I got good feedback on last time 😅
 
  • Like
Reactions: idssdi
Dominik Gräber
Filip Tomiša said:
Nice! Sounds great! One thing that I think that you did better in the previous version is the tapping part you start playing around 0:14. In this version you do it 4 times but in the prevous one you did it 3 times and I think that that sounded better.
Click to expand...
I know exactly what you mean! But I also played it pretty sloppy the first time and so when recording this it would not have synched up with the fast part of the backing track, which I found more important. So I added a half repetition to it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: idssdi and Filip Tomiša
Filip Tomiša
Dominik Gräber The Great said:
I know exactly what you mean! But I also played it pretty sloppy the first time and so when recording this it would not have synched up with the fast part of the backing track, which I found more important. So I added a half repetition to it.
Click to expand...
You could just let that bend ring out for a bit and then start tapping and it would sync. That bend would replace that tapping part and it would give the solo some room to breathe. Also if you have 3 bars of tapping instead of 4, that first one announces what's going to happen for the next two bars, whereas 4 bars kinda let you know that the solo will repeat 4 times and then change after that and it will sound like you are overdoing it. That's why I think 3 bars are better.
 
Dominik Gräber
Filip Tomiša said:
You could just let that bend ring out for a bit and then start tapping and it would sync. That bend would replace that tapping part and it would give the solo some room to breathe. Also if you have 3 bars of tapping instead of 4, that first one announces what's going to happen for the next two bars, whereas 4 bars kinda let you know that the solo will repeat 4 times and then change after that and it will sound like you are overdoing it. That's why I think 3 bars are better.
Click to expand...
Hm. That's not a nice bend to hold onto. Maybe I just add another (double stop?) bend before the tapping.
 
  • Like
Reactions: idssdi
A
This is much cleaner Dom, that is a great improvement! However you aren't quite up to speed, you are falling behind the track and it sounds like you are constantly catching up. You don't have to go full blast all the time, you can build up to the fast part and have that be the cherry on top.
 
  • Like
Reactions: idssdi
Dominik Gräber
Aileé Guerra Aréizaga said:
This is much cleaner Dom, that is a great improvement! However you aren't quite up to speed, you are falling behind the track and it sounds like you are constantly catching up. You don't have to go full blast all the time, you can build up to the fast part and have that be the cherry on top.
Click to expand...
Am I? :oops: I did not notice or felt that. Maybe look up my newer video. I made a second one today in which I took the advice from Filip and Ids, maybe that's better

Edit: It's definetly not slower paced though 😂
 

Media information

Category
Student Shred Collaboration
Added by
Dominik Gräber
Date added
View count
1,567
Comment count
9
Rating
0.00 star(s) 0 ratings

Share this media

Community
Media
Synner
Menu